![sex ed store in ann arbor sex ed store in ann arbor](https://www.mlive.com/resizer/iUUbTcoc_VFe6km38Yh8x_9QjMQ=/450x0/smart/advancelocal-adapter-image-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/image.mlive.com/home/mlive-media/width2048/img/annarbornews_impact/photo/20630850-standard.jpg)
And second of all, it is basically one infusion in a health curriculum about sexually transmitted infections. It's 2018 and I challenge you to go find the sex-ed policy for the state of Ohio. research came out in a way that suggested what the state of Ohio was doing wasn't right, or working, or wanted. Paid for, by the way, with I believe abstinence-only money. We have a staunch researcher, who's well respected, one of our own, with the research study that was statewide. Matter of fact, they wanted a broad curriculum, and they wanted it taught by that classroom teacher, and they wanted that classroom teacher to be informed. It came out clearly - I feel like in 2005-2007 - that abstinence-only is NOT what Ohio's parents and their teens, and then this other group of teens, wanted. If it should be taught and what the content should be. In his applied research facility was commissioned by the state to investigate Ohio's parents and their teens, and then a third group of just teens’ feelings and ideas about what should be taught in a sex-ed program. Seufert, who is on our Middletown campus. I'm thinking of them, you know, Hobby Lobby, as a corporation, determining what a woman can and cannot choose for her birth control methods based on the insurance they offer. I mean, I'm thinking of several examples. I kind of thought we were doing good coming out of it. A huge pathologizing, or medicalizing, or shunning, or shaming, again. And I think we're about to head back into a huge shutdown again. You know, I've read about things in books. And I guess one of the beauties of being an old lady is I now get it.
![sex ed store in ann arbor sex ed store in ann arbor](https://www.sexedcenter.org/wp-content/themes/csetheme/library/images/bg-network.jpg)
And I do feel like we are reflecting those time periods today.
Sex ed store in ann arbor manual#
We took homosexuality out of the Diagnostic Statistical Manual in 1973. They were the first people essentially to write down the four stages of sexual response. You know, without Masters and Johnson’s pioneering work in creating sex therapy, without the experiments in their lab to talk about. Quad-s, the Society for the Scientific Study of Sex, was also, I believe, in ’67. My credentialing body, AASECT, came around in 1967. So, to support your point around this idea of the sexual revolution and, you know, those of us informed, or who have lived through that time period, recognize it. So is that momentum still continuing? Or are we regressing? Or what happened since then? That’s still, anecdotally at least, it’s still seen as a turning point of some kind. And if you do a basic Google search on the sexual revolution, for example, it will tell you about a time in the 1960s when our culture did start to become more open and accepting. So when talking about the need for more sexuality education, it seems like that’s related to how open to that idea we are as a society. I’m hoping this question moves the conversation forward from the last episode but also serves as a good jumping on point for anyone who may not have listened to the first part yet. We’ll talk about the direction society seems to be moving on this issue, and we’ll learn about what Miami’s new Sexuality Education Studies Center will do for the campus and the community. And so, this time we continue our conversation with certified sexuality educator Richelle Frabotta. In our last episode, we began to explore the complex subject of human sexuality, as well as why it’s still so challenging for educators to provide a proper sexuality education. This is Reframe, The podcast from the College of Education, Health and Society on the campus of Miami University in Oxford, Ohio.